Back up plan?? How can we bring down the price of storing our own blood for future use? This would solve the issue without compromising the supply chain.
Blood donation has been monopolized. It's shockingly difficult to donate blood, now. When things get centralized, it's easy for nefarious behavior. We could break up the monopoly. Encourage Idaho blood to be kept in Idaho? I got the strong impression records were being kept on who took these shots.
It sounds like it's fairly easy to see these self assembling nanobots in vax blood.
Who were the people testifying against the blood labeling bill? Who were they associated with? Were they asked about self assembling nanobots?
I don't know who's had these shots until I have reactions when I'm around them.. And I'm not the only one.
I wonder if testimony on testing, was a distraction. We've known PCR tests don't work, since 2020, since AIDS actually, when Dr Mullis explained it. But it sounds like you can see this tech on a slide???
And, it's reported there are cleansing protocols, which blood companies should be able to use? One that comes to mind is nicotine. This tech kills and disables people. Moderna calls it an operating system... Many things can be done to you with this tech. And the ultimate goal is transhumanism/the internet of things.
There’s much more to the arguments for this bill than most committee members probably heard. Here are our thoughts…
———
Donor screening and deferral procedures minimize the possibility of transmitting an infectious agent from a unit of donated blood to the recipient of that unit, as well as ensuring the welfare of the donor —Donor Screening and Deferral (paraphrased)
———
People who receive mRNA vaccines can produce vaccine components in their blood for unknown periods of time; there’s no “off switch.” Therefore, full informed consent makes it imperative for a blood recipient to know whether the blood donor ever received an mRNA vaccine. Blood recipients also must have the right to refuse blood from mRNA vaccinated donors.
Many people were required to show proof of COVID vaccination to enter a business, to work, or to travel. While this public sharing was an egregious affront to medical privacy rights, knowing vaccine status is essential for blood donation. Just as HIV status is screened for the blood supply, mRNA vaccination status also must be screened and indicated on the label of each unit of blood. This indication need not provide personally identifiable donor details.
H0131 is a “truth in labeling” bill requiring donor disclosure of mRNA vaccination status prior to blood donation and to allow blood recipients to refuse mRNA vaccinated blood if alternatives are available for nonemergency procedures.
H0131 Specifics:
- Any person who collects human blood donations for human blood transfusions shall require blood donors to disclose whether they’ve ever received an mRNA vaccine.
- Blood from a donor who has received a mRNA vaccine shall be clearly and conspicuously marked.
- No separate storage of donated blood is required.
- In a non-emergency situation – determined by a medical services provider – a blood transfusion recipient shall have the right to accept or refuse mRNA vaccinated blood, as long as the requested blood is available.
Notes:
- An accurate, definitive test for detecting mRNA vaccination status could be used in lieu of requiring donor disclosure. [Recommend adding to H0131.]
- Donors might lie or refuse to disclose their status.
- Donors might be unaware of their status, e.g., if they were mRNA vaccinated without their knowledge or permission (this has happened).
Another solution has been proposed. Will it get a hearing? DIRECTED BLOOD PRODUCT TRANSFUSION – Adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding directed blood product transfusion: https://tinyurl.com/2p94dynz
Back up plan?? How can we bring down the price of storing our own blood for future use? This would solve the issue without compromising the supply chain.
Blood donation has been monopolized. It's shockingly difficult to donate blood, now. When things get centralized, it's easy for nefarious behavior. We could break up the monopoly. Encourage Idaho blood to be kept in Idaho? I got the strong impression records were being kept on who took these shots.
It sounds like it's fairly easy to see these self assembling nanobots in vax blood.
Who were the people testifying against the blood labeling bill? Who were they associated with? Were they asked about self assembling nanobots?
I don't know who's had these shots until I have reactions when I'm around them.. And I'm not the only one.
I wonder if testimony on testing, was a distraction. We've known PCR tests don't work, since 2020, since AIDS actually, when Dr Mullis explained it. But it sounds like you can see this tech on a slide???
And, it's reported there are cleansing protocols, which blood companies should be able to use? One that comes to mind is nicotine. This tech kills and disables people. Moderna calls it an operating system... Many things can be done to you with this tech. And the ultimate goal is transhumanism/the internet of things.
https://josephsansone.substack.com/p/dr-ana-mihalcea-md-phd-on-mind-matters-c35?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=1021940&post_id=158810286&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=1fbksi&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email.
I believe the spike was transferred to none jabbed people as well. And yeah, we can't trust the tests to be reliable.
There’s much more to the arguments for this bill than most committee members probably heard. Here are our thoughts…
———
Donor screening and deferral procedures minimize the possibility of transmitting an infectious agent from a unit of donated blood to the recipient of that unit, as well as ensuring the welfare of the donor —Donor Screening and Deferral (paraphrased)
———
People who receive mRNA vaccines can produce vaccine components in their blood for unknown periods of time; there’s no “off switch.” Therefore, full informed consent makes it imperative for a blood recipient to know whether the blood donor ever received an mRNA vaccine. Blood recipients also must have the right to refuse blood from mRNA vaccinated donors.
Many people were required to show proof of COVID vaccination to enter a business, to work, or to travel. While this public sharing was an egregious affront to medical privacy rights, knowing vaccine status is essential for blood donation. Just as HIV status is screened for the blood supply, mRNA vaccination status also must be screened and indicated on the label of each unit of blood. This indication need not provide personally identifiable donor details.
H0131 is a “truth in labeling” bill requiring donor disclosure of mRNA vaccination status prior to blood donation and to allow blood recipients to refuse mRNA vaccinated blood if alternatives are available for nonemergency procedures.
H0131 Specifics:
- Any person who collects human blood donations for human blood transfusions shall require blood donors to disclose whether they’ve ever received an mRNA vaccine.
- Blood from a donor who has received a mRNA vaccine shall be clearly and conspicuously marked.
- No separate storage of donated blood is required.
- In a non-emergency situation – determined by a medical services provider – a blood transfusion recipient shall have the right to accept or refuse mRNA vaccinated blood, as long as the requested blood is available.
Notes:
- An accurate, definitive test for detecting mRNA vaccination status could be used in lieu of requiring donor disclosure. [Recommend adding to H0131.]
- Donors might lie or refuse to disclose their status.
- Donors might be unaware of their status, e.g., if they were mRNA vaccinated without their knowledge or permission (this has happened).
Another solution has been proposed. Will it get a hearing? DIRECTED BLOOD PRODUCT TRANSFUSION – Adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding directed blood product transfusion: https://tinyurl.com/2p94dynz
References:
- Independent Medical Alliance (formerly FLCCC) in-depth analysis of Yale study mentioned in Sen. Lenney’s article: https://imahealth.org/yale-study-covid-post-vaccination-syndrome/
- Health Freedom & Other Solutions for Idaho & Beyond: https://eolson47.substack.com/p/health-freedom-and-other-solutions
Donor Screening and Deferral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232407/
This is unfortunate. I never would want to receive blood from someone that had any Covid jabs.
I'm glad you looked at the real science and based you decision on that.
Thank you for trying, and thank you for your explanation.